_GOTOBOTTOM
World War II
Discuss WWII and the era directly before and after the war from 1935-1949.
Hosted by Rowan Baylis
NEWS
Devastating News from GWH!
Merlin
Staff MemberSenior Editor
AEROSCALE
#017
_VISITCOMMUNITY
United Kingdom
Joined: June 11, 2003
KitMaker: 17,582 posts
AeroScale: 12,795 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 12:32 AM UTC
Don't spend all your money before Christmas! You could well need some left in January, as Great Wall Hobby announce the release of the first new 1:48 mainstream kit of the TBD Devastator since the 1970s.

Link to Item



If you have comments or questions please post them here.

Thanks!
Holdfast
Staff MemberPresident
IPMS-UK KITMAKER BRANCH
#056
_VISITCOMMUNITY
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: September 30, 2002
KitMaker: 8,581 posts
AeroScale: 4,913 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 12:57 AM UTC
Don't tell Gaston, it's sure to be fatally flawed I might get one even though it isn't in 1/32
Jessie_C
_VISITCOMMUNITY
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: September 03, 2009
KitMaker: 6,965 posts
AeroScale: 6,247 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 01:53 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Don't tell Gaston, it's sure to be fatally flawed



Then I pre-emptively invoke the Gaston Rule.
Naseby
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Slovakia
Joined: October 15, 2010
KitMaker: 825 posts
AeroScale: 476 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 02:48 AM UTC
I have been waiting for this one for soooo long. Hope it will be acurate enought for a OOB.
russamotto
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Utah, United States
Joined: December 14, 2007
KitMaker: 3,389 posts
AeroScale: 375 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 05:07 AM UTC
I just hope I can afford it. I'd love to get this when it comes out.
GastonMarty
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Quebec, Canada
Joined: April 19, 2008
KitMaker: 595 posts
AeroScale: 507 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 08:21 AM UTC

Well one thing for sure, given how good the old Monogram kit was, this was not the most needed subject of all those they could have picked...

In several most wanted kit surveys, and I can hardly remember the 1:48th Devastator being mentionned once in hundreds of posts, except a handful of times for 1:32 scale...

But then, if they base their research on 36 year old moulds, perhaps they should keep to less popular scale/subject combinations...

Given the work evident in their P-61, these guys seems VERY concerned about saving on research costs, as I will soon make evident (and yet they did not skip for that on the FW-189, or on many other aspects of quality, even on the P-61)...

Gaston





SunburntPenguin
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Joined: March 15, 2011
KitMaker: 121 posts
AeroScale: 112 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 11:08 AM UTC
Gaston

Sight unseen, you are throwing this kit into the same basket as the P-61.

That's either very brave or extremely foolhardy.

How about we wait until we see this kit before making any judgements?
Tailor
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: May 26, 2008
KitMaker: 1,168 posts
AeroScale: 199 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 11:44 AM UTC
Well, I have seen the CAD, but I have to say that - judging from the box - the Devastator will be fatally flawed! They never flew at the shown height and very likely not in that direction. Not even mentioning the wrong weather!



Guido

PS.: Be noted that we had the whole plane designed new, but threw everthing out and copied the Monogram kit only to annoy GM.
Naseby
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Slovakia
Joined: October 15, 2010
KitMaker: 825 posts
AeroScale: 476 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 04:14 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Well one thing for sure, given how good the old Monogram kit was, this was not the most needed subject of all those they could have picked...



Considering I havent seen the Monogram kit in a decade it is a needed subject (Im not an ebay fan).
 _GOTOTOP