_GOTOBOTTOM
Cold War (1950-1974)
Discuss the aircraft modeling subjects during the Cold War period.
Hosted by Tim Hatton
REVIEW
1:32 T-28B/D Trojan
Merlin
Staff MemberSenior Editor
AEROSCALE
#017
_VISITCOMMUNITY
United Kingdom
Joined: June 11, 2003
KitMaker: 17,582 posts
AeroScale: 12,795 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 21, 2016 - 08:03 PM UTC
Here's a look at Kitty Hawk's impressive new largescale kit of the T-28B/D Trojan. Packed with potential, the kit combines features of both versions and so needs a little extra work to represent either, but the resulting model should be spectacular.

Link to Item



If you have comments or questions please post them here.

Thanks!
Joel_W
Staff MemberAssociate Editor
AUTOMODELER
_VISITCOMMUNITY
New York, United States
Joined: December 04, 2010
KitMaker: 11,666 posts
AeroScale: 7,410 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 21, 2016 - 08:32 PM UTC
Rowan, as usual, your review is certainly up to your very high standards. Seems that with each release, KH has upped their game.

I do have the same reservations as you do, that when a kit is manufactured to build up into several versions, that each suffers from little omissions and nuances for the sake of another variant. For the casual builder, whose mostly a model builder, it's not such a big deal. But to those that stray to the rivet counters side of the "fence", I'm sure that they'll find many issues with this release, as they always seem to do.

Joel
Jessie_C
_VISITCOMMUNITY
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: September 03, 2009
KitMaker: 6,965 posts
AeroScale: 6,247 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 21, 2016 - 09:31 PM UTC

Quoted Text

In the event, even the extra power proved insufficient and it was almost doubled in subsequent versions...



Actually if we're dividing rabbits, the underpowered engine was a deliberate choice. Early jets had a less than desirable power lever response time, so the weak engine was selected to teach students to properly manage their energy and airspeed despite the engine.

Jet engines got a bit more muscular, and the US Navy specified a more powerful engine for their variant, which made carrier landings a bit less adventurous.
Merlin
Staff MemberSenior Editor
AEROSCALE
#017
_VISITCOMMUNITY
United Kingdom
Joined: June 11, 2003
KitMaker: 17,582 posts
AeroScale: 12,795 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 21, 2016 - 09:40 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Actually if we're dividing rabbits...



Hi Jessie

I guess it depends whose book on rabbits you read - I was going by Steve Ginter, who wrote that the T-28A was underpowered. Whatever, it was probably plenty exciting enough for trainee pilots!

All the best

Rowan
Jessie_C
_VISITCOMMUNITY
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: September 03, 2009
KitMaker: 6,965 posts
AeroScale: 6,247 posts
Posted: Monday, February 22, 2016 - 04:09 AM UTC
Oh yes, it's very true that it was underpowered. The point I was making was that it was a very deliberate design choice rather than a mistake or a failing of the engine to perform to specifications.
bill_c
Staff MemberCampaigns Administrator
MODEL SHIPWRIGHTS
_VISITCOMMUNITY
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
AeroScale: 1,198 posts
Posted: Monday, February 22, 2016 - 05:37 AM UTC
Very detailed and knowledgeable review, Rowan! Cheers.
flypaper
Joined: May 21, 2007
KitMaker: 51 posts
AeroScale: 49 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 - 09:54 PM UTC
Well as far as I'm concerned this is a must addition to my stash. For 2 years I was a flight line crew chief and mechanic to 12 US Marine T-28B stationed at HQMC Flight Section, NAS, Andrews AFB Wash DC.
Great trouble free a/c, except when you had to check the mags, to bad they missed the chance to include decals for one of our birds....routinely flown by Major John Glenn.
 _GOTOTOP